On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:11:27PM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > Darren J Moffat writes: > > Given all the above this case should be marked as withdrawn sine nothing > > in the case is valid for the new proposal. A new case for delivering top > > should be started. > > What would be the point of that? I think reusing the same case (and > providing a more up-to-date synopsis) would be the better answer.
It's probably useful, though marginally so, to look at case summaries and see that "prstat utility enhancements to look and act more like top" was withdrawn and shortly after a case was submitted and approved for "top for OpenSolaris." Is that sufficiently useful to warrant withdrawing and submitting a new case? Dunno, but if not the IAM does need to be updated so the case shows up as "top for OpenSolaris" instead of "prstat utility enhancements to look and act more like top." Nico --
