Garrett D'Amore wrote: > michael schuster wrote: >> Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> >>> What do we tell consumers? Which library should they use? >> >> I think you're missing the point that many a project in the FOSS world >> *is* using this library, we want them to be able to move so to Solaris >> faster, without having to bring their own copy of the library. > > Maybe, this is the first time this point has been raised. > > Why are they doing this? Are there ways that STLport4 or somesuch is > somehow grossly incompatible? What about projects using STLport5?
IMO it's completely beside the point *why* they are doing so (although I believe Stefan's detailed answers to your previous emails provide sufficient information), the relevant issue here is *that* they are. Michael -- Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
