Don Cragun wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:24:24 +0100
>> From: Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at sun.com>
>>
>> Don Cragun wrote:
>>> Since all open issues have been resolved and there have been no
>>> additional comments for the last six days, I'm marking this case
>>> closed approved.
>> I was still waiting on a proper spec as I had asked for so I'm very
>> surprised to see this as closed. The reason I hadn't commented was
>> because there is no spec to comment on, just a copy of the top man page.
>>
>> What is the release binding, interface taxonomy, package name etc. None
>> of that is covered in the man page.
>
> Quoting from the first message sent to this case's mail log:
> "The project team is requesting a minor release binding."
I didn't see that as relevant given how the case morphed from a symlink
to prstat to actually shipping the real top.
> If you were concerned that the interface taxonomy and package name were
> not covered, I would have expected you to request that information
> before the case timed out;
It was implicit in my message with ID:
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:50:39 +0100
Message-id: <48AC4B5F.6010407 at Sun.COM>
> I see no request for that information in the
> mail log. (It is also interesting to note that there is no interface
> taxonomy listed on the prstat(1M) man page.)
I shouldn't have to ask it is required information for an ARC case.
> I will get the interface taxonomy and package name from the project
> team later this morning. In the interest of not playing fetch a rock,
> what other information are you expecting when you say "etc."?
The basic information we would expect from any fast-track case.
Specifically I want to see the following:
* Package name
* Taxonomy of top functionality:
cli arguments
package name
* Install location of top - I assume it is /usr/bin/top but
this must be explicit
--
Darren J Moffat
