All, This case was approved today at PSARC.
John On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 20:11, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 00:29 -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: > > > > Perhaps there should be a requirement for 2.5 modules? Or just make > > > > both required for the time being? > > > > > > That would make sense, at least until 2.4 is Obsolete, but I'm not > > > sure how to enforce it. > > > > By stating that requirement in this case, setting a precedent that future > > cases will have to follow. Enforcement will be up to the ARC (to point the > > rule out to teams that might not have gotten the message) and the c-teams > > (to make sure that they don't actually integrate without having support for > > both versions). > > Okay, I'll update the proposal to state that it is a requirement to > deliver python modules for both (or all) versions of python and also > 32-bit and 64-bit variants if applicable. > > Laca >
