Scott Rotondo wrote: > Incidentally, did I correctly infer that the future coreadm will require > *only* authorizations (because it will store all state in SMF properties > rather than files that require privilege to write)?
Normally, yes. When coreadm is run with the now undocumented -u option, though, it will still require privileges to function. There is also no change to the mode of operation in which coreadm is applied to another process. Dave
