:) Yeah instability is the word. Do I have to submit a new draft, or is this email affirmation sufficient?
-Brian On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Garrett D'Amore <gdamore at sun.com> wrote: > Yes, I think the point here is that releases of gvim have historically not > introduced new incompatibilities. > > (Indeed, it would seem that there would be little that the editor would > likely be able to do that would break interface > compatibility, without seriously breaking its compatibility with legacy vi, > which is one of its major selling points.) > > -- Garrett > > >> 3.1.1 Interface stability >> >> Vim/gvim has no obvious history of any interface stability and the >> expectation >> is is that dot-dot releases of gvim will be compatible. > > I wonder if something is wrong with that sentence. Did you mean to say > *in*stability? (If so, tell the ARC and the case directory; > I'm just lurking.) > > > -- - Brian Gupta http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/ http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/OpenSolaris_New_User_FAQ
