Garrett D'Amore writes: > So, now my question for PSARC is, if someone (say me, or Philip) wanted > to start up a case to make this a new requirement going forward (and > presumably we could allow for drivers to waive the requirement, but they > should need to be justified) wanted to sponsor a case, does this fall > under the realm of what would be called a fasttrack? > > Such a proposal would itself be very light weight, but I'm not at all > convinced it would be non-controversial enough to qualify for less than > a full case. If nothing else, it gives PSARC a chance to express a > stronger opinion.
If it's the commonly-held opinion of those who work on drivers, then I don't think it should face many problems. If you've discussed it in the appropriate group first, then I see no problem with using a fast-track to establish the new ARC-wide rule. > I'm willing to author the original document (fasttrack or otherwise), > although if its a full case then I need a sponsor on PSARC, I believe. Nope. You'll automatically get a case owner when you get on the review calendar. Full cases don't have "sponsors." -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
