Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>
>> Where "lsarc" could be what I believe are the interested parties.
>> Somethings may be interesting to {psarc, lsarc, wsarc}, but not (for
>> example) fwarc.
>>
>
> Are drivers ever reviewed by any arc other than PSARC? I'm not sure
> LSARC, WSARC or FWARC need to be involved with this.
>
Then I would think this would just be a PSARC requirement, rather than
ARC wide.
I wondered if that was what we really wanted, but I was taking Garrett's
assertion at
face value. If so, its trivial.
- jek3
