[Jyri Virkki:]
| 
| Project team will probably respond on India timezone but I can answer some.
| 
| > edh01 - This may be a question for PSARC and precendence.  I notice this 
| > installs in /usr/squid.  I thought we wanted functional names in the 
| > path?  Is /usr/squid the right place in Solaris? 
| 
| Seems ok to me.
| For instance, we have /usr/apache2 and not /usr/httpd
| (And /usr/php5, instead of maybe /usr/popular-web-scripting-language ;-)
| 
| > edh02 - Where do the version tags described in section 2.2 appear?  They 
| > don't appear as part of the command names as listed in the spec.  How do 
| > I query them?

The squid version can be queried by passing -v argument to the
executable
|cd /usr/squid/sbin
|./squid -v      
Squid Cache: Version 2.6.STABLE16

| > edh03 - In section 2.3 when you say the "modules" are these modules 
| > supplied by squid or by the user?  I assume they are the modules 
| > described in section 3.0  Are all of them compiled in all the time?  If 
| > not how do you choose?
| 
| Squid doesn't support pluggable user-provided modules, so all
| supported modules are known at integration and compiled in.
| 
| > edh04 - Since squid needs to be recompiled each time does that mean 
| > you're delivering source to the end user?
| 
| No (well, source is delivered to opensolaris.org so sort of yes).  The
| feature set is fixed.  I believe the project team chose to include the
| interesting features, the exceptions being functionality that can't be
| compiled on Solaris today due to dependency problems. 
| 
| (One of the goals of the OpenSolaris Web Stack project is to provide
| knowledge on building the components on OpenSolaris so some class of
| customers will download the source & Makefiles from opensolaris.org
| and tweak their own builds, but that is not the formally supported use
| case.)
| 
| > edh05 - Who winds up calling/using all the things in 
| > /usr/quide/libexec?  Why aren't they in /usr/squid/bin?
| 
| Rahul can clarify, but I believe this mirrors /usr/apache2/libexec
| so it contains code used by squid features, not invokable by users.

These are called by the squid binary to provide different
functionalities, (It is kind of like CGIs in Webserver.)

| Rahul, do these really need any visibility to customers? Could these by
| Project Private instead of Uncommitted?

I agree, they should be Project Private.

                                    rahul
--
1. e4 _


Reply via email to