Jyri Virkki wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 5:23 PM, James Carlson wrote:
>>
>> As for libreadline, I had thought that we had other applications
>> delivering in Solaris now that used it, and just had an ugly static
>> linkage for legal reasons. (Really, we should just ship the darned
>> thing already.)
>>
>> Have you asked the SFW gatekeepers about libreadline status?
>
> Correct, SFW has readline available at build time for applications to
> statically link in, even though it is not shipped as a shared library.
>
>
>
This is probably redundant to checks others have made, but I *presume*
hunspell is therefore GPL? One cannot deliver a binary statically
linked against GPL (isn't readline GPL?) unless said binary is also GPL.
-- Garrett
