On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 02:57:13PM -0700, Shawn M. Emery wrote: > Two are being considered for OpenSolaris, so within each OS there could
Why? For interop with MIT krb5 user-land built by users? If MIT krb5 received contributions from us that #ifdef solaris the choice of IPC then this problem goes away. > be options or accross multiple OS's. In any case, I am loath to I don't understand this. > mix-and-match IPCs across kernel and user space as we prevent code reuse > and the inherit benefits that it provides (simplicity, risk, etc.). Yes, me too. So why must we have two?
