On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 03:47:34PM -0800, Danek Duvall wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 05:33:45PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 06:28:32PM -0500, Dale Ghent wrote: > > > On Jan 22, 2009, at 4:17 PM, David.Ford at sun.com wrote: > > > > > > > May I suggest /usr/suncc (short for Sun > > > >Compiler Collection). > > > > > > I like that. > > > > I think I just wrested a concession, that a directory under /usr is not > > needed. A directory under /usr/lib, with symlinks from /usr/bin, should > > do until the i-team is able to spread the bundled bits into the correct > > locations. > > Except that in a parallel thread, Chris told us that there's a bin > directory that users will have to access, as not all things that are there > will have symlinks in /usr/bin (such as "version"). Yes, that could be > /usr/lib/suncc/bin, but is that better than /usr/suncc/bin?
Oh well. I tried :) So count me in favor of /usr/suncc.
