(forwarding to case archives)
> From: Jeff Trawick <Jeffrey.Trawick at Sun.COM> > To: webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [webstack-discuss] Apache and APR-Util Using OpenLDAP > [LSARC/2009/123 FastTrack timeout 02/27/2009] > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:25:50 -0500 > > Danek Duvall wrote: > >Would the binding problems go away if you linked against openldap with > >direct binding? I also see that the library is linked against libsendfile > >and libuuid, which are also unused -- perhaps -z ignore on the link would > >help? > > > > Although I'm familiar with using linker tricks on other platforms to > deal with multiple ldaps, I'm just finding out exactly what you mean by > the term "direct binding" from the Linker and Libraries Guide. Just so I > don't go off in the wrong direction: > > By "binding problem", you mean two symbols used by different objects in > the process, which have the same name, right? > > And anything in an unused library by definition (of "unused") doesn't > participate in a binding problem, right? > > So you're talking about the potential concern that some other user-added > code uses Solaris libldap, while the OpenSolaris-delivered code running > inside Apache uses OpenLDAP, right? > > APR-Util's apr_ldap.so and httpd could link with OpenLDAP using the > direct binding option so that the use of OpenLDAP would be limited to > those objects, right?
