Edward Hunter writes: > Do you want the ARC to raise the LDAP direction issue or do you think > that the project team needs to deal with that? Certainly, the chair > could send a note to the appropriate management.
I think this is something the ARC needs to drive formally. If the project team members want to bring it up as well, that's great, and it would help highlight the issue that we're still doing work in an area where we've defunded the basic system architecture. The harder call is what to do about _this_ project. If I were given a vote, I would argue first for a case dependency on a to-be-named future project that resolves the OpenLDAP versus Native LDAP conflict and sets direction. Failing that, I'd be forced to vote to deny. I still don't think the project team is necessarily doing anything wrong, and the resulting change may well be for the good, but the lack of direction here is just not tolerable. It's not architecture. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
