Daniel Templeton wrote:
> The module that depends on Cilk is optional and ostensibly not widely 
> used.  The plan simply not to deliver that module initially.  The Cilk 
> package will be ported next FY, and after it has been integrated for a 
> couple of builds, I will fill an issue to include the optional FFTW module.
> 

Sounds good. I don't have any other concerns.

Cheers,

Jim

Reply via email to