Brian: >>> If these interfaces are intended for Solaris users to make use of, >>> then should the interfaces be Uncommitted rather than Volatile? It >>> doesn't seem much good to provide interfaces for providing dialogs >>> via shell scripts if the interfaces might change or break. >>> >> As matter of fact, dialog is just a executable utility which is for >> OpenSolaris. That's the reason why I defined it as Volatile. > > > This doesn't seem like a good argument to me. I still don't see > the value in adding interfaces that users are expected to use, that > we also tell them we may change in an ad-hoc fashion. > Could it be ok if I change it to Uncommited? I'll check if those interface change a lot recently in community.
Thanks Jim
