Nicolas Williams wrote:

>On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:46:18AM -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
>  
>
>>Torrey:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Not to start a flame-fest here but haven't we seen a lot of other 
>>>projects come across lately that integrate functionality that matches an 
>>>other project? Why would this be different?
>>>      
>>>
>>I don't think it is a problem to have duplicate functionality,
>>personally.  I would just like to hear that the project teams delivering
>>related projects are talking together and formulating their plans with
>>each other in mind, cooperating with work on any common dependencies,
>>etc.  At least aware of each other.
>>    
>>
>
>We should deliver both.  And we should do that wherever there's dups in
>the FOSS world.
>  
>
I totally agree personaly. We should give users more opportunities to 
choice what they want, that's what the real open source are for.

Reply via email to