Hi, all So the conclusion from the discussion is 1. it doesn't matter to integrate projects with duplicated functionality, we are aiming at providing the users with more choices 2. the project team will work together with project teams of similar project to improve cooperation 3. Mime types of file extensions issue exists in all kind of systems, which should not be a blocking issue for this case.
If there's no more issues with this case within 24 hours, I'd like to close this case as approved then. Thanks --Irene On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 15:53 +0800, Jim Li wrote: > Brian: > >> Not to start a flame-fest here but haven't we seen a lot of other > >> projects come across lately that integrate functionality that matches > >> an other project? Why would this be different? > > > > I don't think it is a problem to have duplicate functionality, > > personally. I would just like to hear that the project teams delivering > > related projects are talking together and formulating their plans with > > each other in mind, cooperating with work on any common dependencies, > > etc. At least aware of each other. > > > There aren't any common dependencies between Openproj and Planner. > Anyway, I'll keep my eyes on Planner and keep in touch with the teams. > > Thanks > Jim
