Joerg Schilling wrote: > Kyle McDonald <KMcDonald at egenera.com> wrote: > > >> As far as what a replacement for CacheFS might be able to do, I'd like >> to see even more of a 'Work Offline' feature than it had in th past. >> Nico mentions using it for CIFS, and Allowing the user to select files >> to be available all the time (on or offline) is one feature CIFS has had >> for a while now, and one I find myslef wishing for often when running >> Solaris on a laptop. >> > > What we also need iss something like an overlay filesystem. This helps to make > life (CD based) boot environments useful for more than simple tests. > > J?rg > >
Adding cachefs EOF alias to this discussion, so that other people who worked on cachefs in the past are involved aswell. Regards Kiran
