Petr Sumbera wrote: > James Carlson wrote: > >> Ah, I see. Still, when it comes time to do "tomcat6," it'll look a >> little confusing to have "tomcat55" in there, so I'd prefer just "5." > > Ok, let's use "tomcat5".
We used to have just /usr/apache2 now we have /usr/apache2/2.2 and SMF service instances :apache2 and :apache22. I think the same should be done for Tomcat, ie tomcat55 in this case, based on my past exposure to it and the other comments in this case about needing to know exactly which version of Tomcat you are dealing with. Also experience from JDK's should tell us that we should, sadly, be as specific as we can. -- Darren J Moffat
