Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > one comment. > a boolean "high-speed" property makes sense when there are only > two speeds available (ie, use 1.0 and usb 2.0) but i keep hearing > about usb 3.x compared with the next version of firewire, etc. > perhaps something more future proof would make sense for a committed > interfaces?
I was initially going to send a very similar comment then I remembered that "high-speed" is actually USB terminology in common use. IMO it wasn't forward thinking terminology for considering future faster (even-higher-speed then no-really-we-mean-it-this-time-high-speed) but looked great for marketing. Since it is in very common use when talking about USB devices I suspect is is probably a reasonable choice here (sadly) and hope that the usb 3.x spec produced a better term than "even-higher-speed". -- Darren J Moffat
