On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:12:55AM +0100, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: > I note that this is a lot worse for people who update biweekly,, > but I also wonder why postrun needs to run at standard priority? > > Some systems will run certain services faster and appear up more quickly > if postrun is run at a lower CPU priority.
Would it be useful to be able to associate postrun with services? Think "update method". After an alt-root/LU upgrade every affected service would have it's update method run prior to its start method.
