Roland Mainz wrote: >> Something should be done with 2007/233 to reflect this. >> > > Erm... yes... originally I thought the cases were closed until Don > reminded me that they're still half-alive and twitching... does anyone > know what needs to be done in this case (e.g. add a comment which says > "...the PS1 part for ksh93 was superceeded by PSARC/2008/094..." ?) ? > Like sending mail PSARC-EXT with the subject "PSARC/2007/233 dependency" and the appropriate words in the body? :-)
Of course, wait for 094 to be approved with the correct words. - jek3
