On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:11:41AM -0800, Lloyd L Chambers wrote: > I'll raise this case at LSARC business tomorrow. If it has no > objections, we'll approve it (assuming ARC members have read it).
This is the first I've seen of this case, and given that there's no interface table in the one-pager, then I don't think it'll be ready for approval tomorrow. > I'm not a Solaris guy, maybe another LSARC member can chime in here on > the namespace/package name issue. This isn't brought up in the one-pager; is it part of the email trail you copied in this message? Because the project started by sending a one-pager to the one-pager alias and no one participating in The List triage suggested that it should be other than a full case, it's a full case, waiting for an owner. I don't know why it didn't come up at an LSARC meeting as needing an owner, but it does show up on the LSARC web page as such (along with a few others that I don't think we've discussed). Have we been skipping part of business by accident? Danek
