On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 05:06:45PM -0800, Liane Praza wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > > I guess we still have time, before degraded is actually implemented, to > > resolve the shared configuration issue. Or you could have another svcs > > option to control whether degraded -> error. > > svcs -x already considers degraded to be a "service that is enabled but > not running". This case doesn't change that fact.
Huh? Since what build? I don't see that with fairly recent bits (degraded shows up as "online").
