Scott Rotondo wrote: > Phi Tran wrote: >> Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: >>> The open question I have is: "do we really a new profile". There's >>> already a "File System Management". (includes commands like format, >>> fsck, newfs, mkfs). Hm, not fdisk, though.... >>> >> >> I agree that the "File System Management" profile should be used. A >> new profile will not be needed since auths will not be used. >> >> Phi > > Just as an aside, if you were adding new authorizations, there's no > reason you couldn't add them to the File System Management profile.
Yes, I was mistaken. > > I'm glad that you've decided to use an existing profile and not add new > authorizations. I just wanted to clarify that these are two separate > decisions. Got it. Thanks. Phi
