Gordon Ross writes:
>
> > Also, why should dirperms default to 755 instead of 700?
>
> They're not. The default dirperms are derived from whatever
> turns out to be the fileperms setting, plus X bits. i.e.
> if the user specifies fileperms=640, the default dirperms
> will be 750. If they don't specify either one, the default
> dirperms will be 700.
I'm guessing the (unchanged) logic is something like:
dirperms = fileperms;
if (fileperms & 0600)
dirperms |= 0100;
if (fileperms & 0060)
dirperms |= 0010;
if (fileperms & 0006)
dirperms |= 0001;
> Again, that part of the functionality is not changed by
> this proposal.
OK; that sounds good to me. +1
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
