On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote: > > > > Repeat after me: "If /usr/include/schily/ is unacceptable in OpenSolaris > I > > > will first need to remove /usr/include/ast". > > > > John was actually trying to HELP star get integrated by suggesting that > > the issue of the include files be dealt with in another case where an > > appropriate discussion can be had. > > If he tried to help, he is a master in hiding this fact ;-)
Joerg, please stop assuming people do not want to help. I think it was a misunderstanding on your part as I clearly understood John was trying to help. Suggesting that a particular action be deferred to a later date or case is being *helpful*. > > A later case that presents either parts of the Schily system or the > > whole thing is the best place to have the discussion. In my opinion > > ast and plenty of other things already set sufficient precedence but I'd > > like to see a case (or cases) that deals with the library interfaces > > separately from a case (this one) that deals with the admin usable CLI > > of star. That is what John means two when he says "NOT THIS CASE". > > > > We can get star integrated via this case or we can have a big long > > discussion about stuff that wasn't part of this case material. Which > > would you prefer we do now ? > > Future cases can be discussed much easier if the intention of a reply > is clearly visible. If you are unsure of the intention of a reply, then please ask the person to explain their position. Do not assume they want to hinder you. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben
