On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 08:03:58AM -0700, Liane Praza wrote:
> Ugh. That's what I'm not at all convinced of. You'd be both changing
> the default behaviour of svcs -x to print more services (IIRC Nico was
> opposed to this), and ending up with some kind of weird exit codes.
My objection was, admittedly, weak. IIRC I conceded that when I made
it.
I think the simplest thing to do would be to have one error code mean
"one or more services in maintenance state" another to mean "no services
in maintenance but one or more degraded" and, of course, 0 ("no services
in maintenance and no services degraded").
Actually, even simpler: tell me to stuff it :) (In which case we'll
simply up the priority on common config storage for props that the SMB
server and idmap want to share.)
Nico
--
