On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 18:27 +0100, Bart Blanquart wrote: > The device_allocate(4) manpage does seem incomplete. Looking at the > manpages for allocate(1) and deallocate(1) they do explain that it's > run both at allocation and deallocation. The page should probably be > updated to read "...any time the device is acted upon by allocate(1) > or deallocate(1)".
I agree that there's an obvious inconsistency here so I filed: 6675268 device_allocate(4) inconsistent with deallocate(1) and itself to track it.
