Raymond Xiong wrote: > On 03/24/08, Jim Walker wrote: >> Raymond Xiong wrote: >>> On 03/24/08, Jim Walker wrote: >>>>> Interfaces >>>>> ========== >>>>> >>>>> SUNWerlang-r12b Uncommitted Package Name >>>>> SUNWerlang-r12b-doc Uncommitted Package Name >>>> Would more general SUNWerlang and SUNWerlang-doc package names >>>> be better? > > I don't have specific reason, but I observed other language(ie., > Ruby, Java, Perl, etc.) were all packaged in this way. I think > it's good to have this flexibility? > > Because Erlang/OTP R12B release is rather new, it is probably > not well tested and supported for some applications. For example, > below is from ejabberd README on which Erlang version to use: > > "Erlang/OTP R10B-9 up to R11B-5. Erlang R12 releases are not yet > officially supported, and are not recommended for production > servers" >
Thanks for clarifying. -jim
