Darren Reed wrote:
> You've picked up on something I left out, which means I'll need to
> update the spec
> and resend.
>
> What I left out was providing the means to listen on and receive updates
> to:
> - protocols being added/removed
> - events being added/removed
> - hooks fpr events being added/removed
OK
> I called it "family" because it relates to how the implementation fits
> together.
>
> If I sit back and look at, like you do, it does seem a rather bizarre
> choice of name
> given where it appears and how it is used.
>
> A better combination might be to use "net_handle_t" with "hne_protocol" and
> "hpe_protocol".
Works for me.
>> Finally an important terminology nit. We don't have anything called
>> "stack instance" in Solaris. We have IP Instances used by exclusive-IP
>> zones. Sticking to that terminology (which is more succinct than
>> talking about "stacks") means that all occurances of "stack" in the
>> document should be removed or replaced by "instance". (I can edit the
>> document for this if you'd like.)
>
>
> Yup, I understand that - the inclusion of the term "stack instance" was
> a mistake.
> I should have made a sweep over for that specifically.
Thanks,
Erik