Thanks.

Please see attachment for updated version.



>>>    4.5. Interfaces:
>>>
>>>         Exported  Interface
>>>
>>>    Interface                          Classification         Comments
>>>    -----------------------------     --------------  
>>> ----------------------
>>>    SUNWraptor                        Uncommitted     Package name
>>>    SUNWraptor-devel                  Uncommitted     Package name
>>>    /usr/bin/rapper                   Volatile        parser utility
>>>    /usr/bin/raptor-config            Volatile        config utility
>>>    /usr/lib/libraptor.so.1           Volatile        library
>>>    /usr/share/man/man1/rapper.1      Volatile        man page
>>>    /usr/share/man/man1/raptor-config.1
>>>                                      Volatile        man page
>>>    /usr/share/man/man3/libraptor.3   Volatile        man page
>>>    /usr/lib/pkgconfig/raptor.pc      Volatile        pc file
>>>    /usr/include/raptor.h             Volatile        Header file
>>>    /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/raptor    Volatile        help file
>
> Some comments:
>
> 1. Man pages aren't interfaces and shouldn't be included here.
> 2. Documentation isn't an interface and shouldn't be include here.
> 3. Individual include files don't need to be specified.
> 4. Package classifications should match interface classifications.
> 5. Library symlink should be provided.
>
> Here's what I end up with:
>
> Interface                         Classification  Comments
> -----------------------------     --------------  ------------------
> SUNWraptor                        Volatile        Package name
> SUNWraptor-devel                  Volatile        Package name
> /usr/bin/rapper                   Volatile        parser utility
> /usr/bin/raptor-config            Volatile        config utility
> /usr/lib/libraptor.so          Volatile      library symlink
> /usr/lib/libraptor.so.1           Volatile        library
> /usr/lib/pkgconfig/raptor.pc      Volatile        pc file
> /usr/include/                     Volatile        Header files
>
> Also, it would be good for the desktop community to evaluate the current
> strategy of only delivering 64bit libraries as needed. It's normally
> easier for engineers to produce both archs at the time of initial
> putback then later, and we are seeing more and more interest in
> community members wanting to produce 64bit ready desktops. Because of
> this, "as needed" strategy it creates a barrier. If you are concerned
> about space, you could include the 64bit libraries only in the devel
> packages for now.
>
> Cheers,
> Jim
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: onepage-raptor.txt
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090803/9503f5bc/attachment.txt>

Reply via email to