Dear Mark and ARC guys,

Please see and record the attached approved contract for bmc_intf.h for 
ARC case: Number:PSARC/2009/245.

Thanks

Zdenek



-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: contract for bmc_intf.h
Date:   Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:02:11 -0700
From:   Neal Pollack <neal.poll...@sun.com>
To:     Seth Goldberg <Seth.Goldberg at Sun.COM>
CC:     Zdenek.Macura at Sun.COM, Fritz Ferstl <ferstl at sun.com>, Michal 
Bachorik - Sun Microsystems - Prague Czech Republic 
<Michal.Bachorik at Sun.COM>, Jan Forch <Jan.Forch at Sun.COM>, Norman Jacobs 
<Norm.Jacobs at Sun.COM>, Mark.Carlson at Sun.COM
References:     <4A7B1428.8070508 at Sun.COM> <4A7B170E.9030805 at sun.com> 
<4A7B1A13.5090606 at Sun.COM> <4A7B5ED2.9020101 at sun.com> 
<alpine.GSO.2.00.0908061554350.887115 at oretfbsg.Jrfg.Fha.PBZ>



Seth Goldberg wrote:
> 
>  This is what you need:
> 
> 
> 2.  The SUPPLIER (definer and/or implementor) is identified by the 
> following:
>     Product or Bundle:                  Solaris
>     Consolidation:                      ON
>     Department or Group:                X86 BU353
>     Bugtraq Category/SubCategory:       driver/bmc
>     Responsible Manager:                Neal.Pollack at Sun.COM
> 
> 5.  The ARC controlling these INTERFACES is:
> 
>         PSARC
> 
> 6.  The CASE describing these INTERFACES is:
> 
>         2005/161
> 
> 14. SUPPLIER and CONSUMER agree that this contract can be terminated as
>     follows:
> 
>     At EOL of 'freeipmi' or at any time by mutual agreement.
> 
> 
>  --S


So as not to hold up this work while I am out on vacation,
with the above blanks filled in by Seth, I hereby
APPROVE
of this contract.

Neal Pollack


> 
> 
> 
> Quoting Neal Pollack, who wrote the following on Thu, 6 Aug 2009:
> 
>> Zdenek.Macura at Sun.COM wrote:
>>> On 08/06/09 19:46, Fritz Ferstl wrote:
>>>> Shouldn't 5 & 6 refer to our ARC case?
>>> That is what I'm not sure since our ARC case is already mentioned in 
>>> the section "0"
>>> ...0.  Number:PSARC/2009/245 ...
>>>
>>> I think this will be related to other cases ...not sure
>>>>
>>>> 14 is what you guys have to work out. It can terminate when certain 
>>>> things cease to exist or after a period of time or upon some 
>>>> communications between both teams.
>>> I would leave the proposal up to Neal and then look at it to see if 
>>> we can accept it.
>>
>>
>> Please work with Seth Goldberg on my end.  I am on vacation,
>> returning next Wednesday.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Neal
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Zdenek
>>>>
>>>> I'm fine otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Fritz
>>>>
>>>> Zdenek.Macura at Sun.COM wrote:
>>>>> Hi Neal and Fritz,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have filled out the contract form 
>>>>> http://sac.eng/arc/ARC-Templates/contract for our case with 
>>>>> bmc_intf.h.
>>>>> Please see the attached contract.
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't edited the following sections since I wasn't sure what to 
>>>>> put there: 2., 5., 6., 14.
>>>>> ( I assume Neal will know )
>>>>> All other sections I filled out according to what I think should be 
>>>>> there or what I think could be good to be there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fritz, please review the document ( you represent CONSUMER of the 
>>>>> contract ) and in case you would do it differently, let us know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neal, please fill out the remaining sections and approve it via 
>>>>> e-mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot
>>>>>
>>>>> Zdenek
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to