Darren J Moffat wrote: > > It is a little unfortunate that we already have usr/sbin/zebra that is > nothing to do with this. However I don't beleive any changes to this case > are required as a result of that since there is not path name conflicts even > though there are similar ones /usr/sbin/zebra vs /usr/bin/zebrasrv.
Right. We considered this. There aren't any namespace conflicts with the current zebra package and the names used in this case are still the "familiar" ones. Cheers, Jim
