Brian Cameron wrote:
> 
> Alan:
> 
>> I don't see a mention in this case of GDM replacing dtlogin as the
>> default login screen, and EOL'ing dtlogin - is that going to be
>> handled by this case or are you going to bring LSARC 2005/417 back
>> again to do that at the same time as this case integrates?
> 
> I would prefer to handle the EOL'ing of dtlogin as a separate case.
> The added complexities of EOL'ing dtlogin caused the LSARC 2005/417
> to derail, and I would prefer for that to not happen again.

Given that it's already defacto happened in OpenSolaris, and will be
the case in all available Nevada builds shortly, I'd expect to see that
case soon - even if it's derailed, at this point the only options are
approve (possibly with TCR's) or deny so that it can be appealed and
overruled.

Delaying it or pretending it's not happening is simply ignoring reality
and serves no one's interest.

-- 
        -Alan Coopersmith-           alan.coopersmith at sun.com
         Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering


Reply via email to