On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:02:41PM +0200, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: > >Incidentally, Linux has its own list API, including inlined functions. > >It'd be nice to have compatibility with that. Also, I second Darren's > >sentiment w.r.t. the AVL tree API. > > Inlining is not much different from macro's. I've used the AVL lists for
Indeed. I mentioned it for that reason. But then, the Linux kernel doesn't pretend to have ABI compatibility for anything other than the interfaces to user-land (like glibc). > the "Turbo charged SVR4 packages" and they work really well and they're > about as quick appending to a linked list. (SQL was clearly not properly > suited for handling a very simple database) The AVL API should be made a public API. Yes, yes, not this case.
