Rod Evans wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
>> Really, apart from the incursion of a little extra delay (probably
>> one week in this case), there is nothing else needed at this point if
>> your case is turned into a fast track, except in the unlikely event
>> that someone takes exception with the case.
>
> I still don't see the point.
>
> We don't decide upon submitting a fast-track, or a self-review case
> based on the time we wish to wait for the process to complete, we
> always wait a day or two after submitting a self-review to ensure
> we give folks time to comment.
>
> We make the distinction based upon whether we feel there's any
> architectural issues that might concern or be of interest to the
> ARC. In this case, as with most linker cases, we don't think there
> are. Thus, we're going to use the lightest weight process.
>
Alright, I yield. I thought that there might be something here of
architectural interest. I guess nobody else thinks so, and I'm happy
with the case as specified, so let it go as self-review.
- Garrett
