Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> Hmm.. I forgot, is OpenSSL now "public"?  I know that there have been
>> plans to raise its commitment, but I don't recall if the case to make
>> it public has happened yet.
> 
> It has been "public" since it was first delivered as shared libraries as
> part of Solaris 10.
> 
>> If it *is* public, then I'll be happy to give this case a +1.
> 
> It is.

Maybe that's the wrong question.  Aren't there a bunch of cases with
contracts on 2003/500 for OpenSSL?  Are contracts still required for its
use?

(Unfortunately, 2003/500 is not published, and 2006/019 is completely
redacted -- apparently because it's marked "manual" but has no
".opensolaris" files in it -- so there's not much to go on externally.)

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <carlsonj at workingcode.com>

Reply via email to