Darren J Moffat wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> Hmm.. I forgot, is OpenSSL now "public"? I know that there have been >> plans to raise its commitment, but I don't recall if the case to make >> it public has happened yet. > > It has been "public" since it was first delivered as shared libraries as > part of Solaris 10. > >> If it *is* public, then I'll be happy to give this case a +1. > > It is.
Maybe that's the wrong question. Aren't there a bunch of cases with contracts on 2003/500 for OpenSSL? Are contracts still required for its use? (Unfortunately, 2003/500 is not published, and 2006/019 is completely redacted -- apparently because it's marked "manual" but has no ".opensolaris" files in it -- so there's not much to go on externally.) -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj at workingcode.com>