On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 20:35 +0900, Fuyuki Hasegawa - Sun Microsystems wrote: > Sebastien Roy wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 03:54 -0700, Fuyuki Hasegawa wrote: > >> I'm submitting this fast-track for myself (IM group), scheduled to timeout > >> at 09/24/2009. > > > > FYI, I requested more time on this case during today's PSARC meeting as > > it had yet to receive a +1 from an ARC member. I've posted some > > questions based on my review. Please extend the timer for another few > > days to accommodate for for the resolution of those issues (which are > > all relatively minor). > > Hi Sebastien, > > I thought fast-track will automatically be approved without explicit +1 > if there is no objection during review period, usually 1 week.
Fast-tracks require a member review within the 1 week timer, otherwise the case is automatically rejected as not reviewed. At least, that's the defined process. A +1 is required. In this case, I had noticed that the one week timer had expired without the required +1, but I'm offering my review in order to prevent this case from being automatically rejected. > Anyway from the last meeting minutes, I knew the timer of this case was > extended till 09/30. Since we didn't receive further questions/comments > other than Rainer until now, I expected the case would be approved today. > > We have been planning to integrate ibus into snv_125 where last build > before the limited contents builds. The delivery due for a new pkg > was today. I've requested to WOS RE to delay the integration till > 10/5 where final delivery deadline for all pkgs. > > To meet the snv_125 delivery due and also since the issues were > relatively minor, I would like to extend the timer till 10/02/2009 > (although it extends only two days). Yes, that's fine. I'll follow-up on your response to my comments. This shouldn't last past 10/02. Thanks, -Seb
