It's pretty obvious from the thread on *this* case that there was significant review.
Are you asserting that it would still need a +1? Then you are changing the definition of that we put in place when we started this practice. You are right that a simple comment from a non-member would not suffice for review. -- mark Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Mark A. Carlson wrote: >> a +1 is not a vote. It's original purpose was to indicate that >> *in the absence of any visible review* - someone had reviewed >> it and was OK with the case. Prior to this, cases were slipping >> through approved without such an indication. >> >> Unless the case mail file is empty (save for the project proposal) >> you don't need a +1 to close the case. > > Huh?!? While the purpose of the +1 is to indicate that review > occurred, I've interpreted that it is still necessary because it > indicates that the review occurred *and* the reviewer is satisfied > with the results. > > I don't think its a good idea to let cases get approved just because > someone sends a comment about the case (which might or might not > indicate a real review occurred.) > > - Garrett
