Mike Oliver wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> Artem Kachitchkine wrote: >>> >>>> Hence, we feel it is appropriate to remove the bpp driver from Nevada, >>>> as the driver will not be useful to users of OpenSolaris or Solaris >>>> Next. >>> >>> I think this case would benefit from explicitly stating what will >>> happen to <sys/bpp_io.h> and the interfaces it defines. There are >>> currently consumers in the kernel (ecpp, usbprn) and the userland >>> (LP subsystem, 3rd party apps). >>> >>> -Artem >> If there are other consumers that depend on it, then I would *not* be >> removing the header file. To be honest, I hadn't tried searching >> with OpenGrok to find out who was using these header files. > > Sun Ray's parallel port driver depends on <sys/bpp_io.h>.
That's fine. It looks like I'll be leaving the header in place. I've no problem with that. - Garrett > > Mike.