Okay, I've posted materials; took me a while to write the spec.txt file
that captured all the compatibility issues (I also needed to test it!)
The materials directory is:
gd78059 at sac{28}> ls -la materials/
total 1218
drwxr-sr-x 2 gd78059 sac 9 Oct 29 14:24 .
drwxrwsr-x 6 gd78059 sac 10 Oct 29 14:22 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 gd78059 sac 7121 Oct 29 14:24 ode.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 gd78059 sac 21378 Oct 29 14:24 plot.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 gd78059 sac 18940 Oct 29 14:24 plotfont.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 gd78059 sac 511924 Oct 29 14:24 plotutils.info
-rw-r--r-- 1 gd78059 sac 9955 Oct 29 14:23 spec.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 gd78059 sac 11486 Oct 29 14:24 spline.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 gd78059 sac 18417 Oct 29 14:24 tek2plot.1
The main content is in spec.txt.
Asa, can you add this casse to the next available PSARC agenda for
this? Thanks.
- Garrett
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> James Carlson wrote:
>>> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm going to leave this case open for now. Probably the spec needs to
>>>> include a full spec for importing GNU plotutils and replacing our
>>>> legacy
>>>> bits.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This sounds like good stuff to me, but perhaps (particularly with the
>>> unsettled parts) getting over the line for a fast-track.
>>>
>>>
>> You may be correct. I'm certainly not in any rush to do this -- I'd
>> rather Do The Right Thing.
>>
>> -- Garrett
>>
>
> I'm derailing this case now. I'll post an updated spec shortly -- but
> probably *not* a full 20q document, because while there is at least
> one potentially contentious issue that I think deserves a vote, the
> spec itself will be easy to understand without needing a 20q. The
> case will also be changing titles. Stay tuned.
>
> - Garrett
>
