the case should've used the term "multi-protocol packet generation"
instead of "attack tool".
At this point I'm withdrawing the case, and will be consulting with the
project team whether to submitted it back
as a full case, or deliver it under /contrib as it was suggested here
and off-line.
Kais
On 11/25/09 07:06, John Fischer wrote:
> Kais,
>
> Although this case might be a familiarity case I think it fails the
> non-controversial condition for a fast track. Garrett and Darren
> have already questioned it raising the controversial question. I
> also question the need to supply this in our repositories. I would
> suggest that it be a full case.
>
> John
