Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:59:42PM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>
>>> We'll have to agree to disagree. Debating this further on this list
>>> is not productive though; the case is withdrawn. (And never was the
>>> case denied, merely "derailed". Your reactions to derailing could
>>> be seen as overreacting, actually.) Please either drop PSARC, or
>>> drop the conversation. I'm more than happy to debate it *off* of
>>> the main PSARC alias.
>>>
>>
>> I understand what de-railing means. I'm reacting mostly to the
>> withdrawal of the case. But also, when it comes to FOSS, the ARC can't
>> be de-railing too often, else the process will be unbearable, which is
>> partly why I asked if it wouldn't be better if all non-core FOSS always
>> went through /contrib first: partly because the ARC would be less
>> relevant to FOSS then, partly because the i-teams would get instant
>> gratification, partly because it'd give the potentially controversial
>> cases time to soak.
>>
>
> I agree that it makes more sense for things that really are
> fundamental portions of the OS to be integrated into /contrib first,
> and maybe even only.
I meant "are not fundamental" of course.
- Garrett
>
