Darren, Yes, you're right. There aren't any interface changes to smbadm. Thanks for the review,
Natalie Darren J Moffat wrote: > I don't see any issues with this proposal. The interoperatbility with > CIFS clients and AD is what I'd expect. The keytab entries for > Solaris are again what I'd expect (I wasn't aware of the need for the > netbios one though). > > So I'm happy to give this a +1 as specified. > > The one nit I have is I didn't see an updated smbadm(1M) man page - is > that because there are no visible interface changes to it ? > > -- > Darren J Moffat
