Darren writes:
> While I think it is unfortunate we need yet another special uid/gid for
> this it seems like the only workable solution (I'd already discussed
> this offline with the project team). So I'm happy to given this case a
> +1 as specified.
I agree with Darren, it's unfortunate (and that nobody4 cannot
be repurposed).
Tim writes:
> Proposed Solution:
> ------------------
>
> The /etc/passwd entry will be as follows:
> unknown:x:96:96:Unknown Remote UID:/:
>
> The /etc/shadow entry will be as follows:
> unknown:NP:::::::
Why is this being proposed as a nologin account (NP) rather
than a locked account (*LK*)? Why does unknown need to
run jobs on the system?
+1 if a locked account.
Gary..
