Hi Sebastien.
>> Regarding the SVR4 and IPS package issue, Jack will help to address the
>> issue and cite appropriate bugs to IPS team. Thanks a lot for Jack's
>> help.
>
> That is a step in the right direction, but I was hoping for something
> more specific before this case gets approved. For example, a
> statement to the effect, "we've spoken with the IPS team, and they've
> committed to X to address the issue" or "we've spoken with the IPS
> team, and we will be modifying the architecture of this case by doing
> Y in order to play nice with IPS".
I have spoken with the IPS team about this issue, which is encapsulated
as their bug 2434. They have agreed to fix it.
I have also updated 2434 to make it clear that this PSARC case requires
that it get fixed.
Thanks,
Jack
>
> Thanks,
> -Seb
