On 04/14/10 09:33 AM, Joel Buckley wrote:
Jim,
I believe this is incorrectly included in Live Update interfaces:
luxadm Obsolete [1]
Cheers,
Joel.
Nice catch Joel -- that *clearly* doesn't belong here.
Modulo fixing that problem, I'm going to say for the record that I've
never been happy about not having a good upgrade path between Solaris 10
and Solaris Next. Of course, we've already left that concern behind a
long time ago.
I'd really like section 4.2 or section 6 to indicate advice that some
form of "supported" solution for migrating S10 customers to Solaris Next
is needed. (I do recall someone mentioning that P2V is supported right
now? If so, then perhaps the opinion here should mention that.)
In any case, I'm going to go ahead and give this case my vote to approve.
- Garrett
On 04/14/10 09:26, Jim Walker wrote:
Here is the draft opinion for PSARC/2010/059 SNAP BE Management.
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/059/opinion_draft.txt
I request an email vote.
Let me know if you have any comments.
Cheers,
Jim
--
<http://www.oracle.com/>Joel Buckley | +1.303.272.5556
Oracle Open Storage Systems
500 Eldorado Blvd
Broomfield, CO 80021-3400
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-arc mailing list
[email protected]
