"Richard L. Hamilton" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is the implementation of hsfs therefore known to be robust > against kernel crashes due to a corrupted filesystem, or is it simply > that the demand is so high for lofi plus hsfs? What about udfs - if > one wants to use CD images, presumably one might want do use DVD-ROM > images as well.
As I was working on making hsfs robust against any kind of rotten data, I can grant you that hsfs is robust ;-) Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ opensolaris-arc mailing list [email protected]
